Translation and Half-caste Essay Example for Free

Translation and Half-caste Essay Half-Caste is a poem written by John Agard. It presents another culture through dialect and uses complicated terminology. The poem is quite emotional and John Agard uses many techniques to present his ideas and views on Half-Caste. The poem is all about the different definitions of Half-Caste, it is undefined. Agard compares the word half-caste to Tchaikovsky’s piano, Picasso’s canvas and English weather. Firstly, John Agard uses rhetorical questions throughout the poem; ‘what yu mean?’ this shows that nobody knows what Half-Caste means it is down to the reader’s own opinion. This is repeated a lot throughout the poem. Rhetorical questions were very effective in this poem as it made the reader think imagine what the phrase half-caste means. Another technique that Agard uses is repetition; ‘what yu mean when yu say half-caste’. This demonstrates that John wants to emphasise this phrase. Repetition helps the reader to think about what half-caste actually means because it shows that there is no real definition and that it is the reader’s own interpretation of the word. The poet tells the poem in a confronting way because he uses the word ‘Half-Caste’. The poem is confrontational because the poem is coming across in an argumentative way especially against those who are half-caste. This could offend some people so the reader may think that, Half-Caste could be quite offensive. Half-Caste has many emotional thoughts. For example; is there anything wrong with the term ‘Half-Caste’, is it insulting, is he proud. A mixture of emotions are used here, including tension and anxiety, anger and also happiness. John Agard presents his ideas in a confusing way. The reader would think this because he does not actually know what half-caste means but yet writes a poem about different views of the term half-caste. He also writes the poem as a past experience as if he was a victim of racism. Agard uses things associated with half-caste so maybe he has been affected; ‘one leg’, ‘half of mih ear’, ‘half of mih eye’, ‘half-a-hand’. This shows that Agard must understand what half-caste is all about but he signals that half-caste is undefined without saying it in the poem. John Agard is very open-minded during the poem; ‘an I will tell yu de other half of my story’. This could show that there is another half to his story and that there may be a more cheerful side of his story. These words show that you should not judge people if you do not know them and don’t be judgemental. It does not matter what race or culture you are, be mindful. Agard uses insults to present his views on the term Half-Caste; ‘ah rass’. This could be offensive and cause anger towards the reader. The poem suggests that the reader only knows the definition of half-caste if you are half-caste. It is outsmarting all of the racist people because racist people may find the poem an insult. In the poem, the reader thinks it suggests that everything is a bit mixed up but it does not matter because everyone is unique and different. In conclusion, John Agard uses a variety of effective techniques to present the ideas and views to the reader. The reader thinks that the poem is quite confusing in the way it is written because it compares lots of things that the reader is not entirely sure define the term Half-Caste. The reader likes the way that Agard writes the poem as a past experience. Agard uses many techniques such as rhetorical questions and repetition which makes the reader think but also makes the poem flow well. Overall, the reader thinks that Half-Caste is a good poem that explains the different meanings of Half-Caste.

Trumans Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Essay -- Japan, World War II,

Imagine yourself making the toughest decision in your life, whether sacrificing a million of our men and thousands of war ships and plans, verses several thousand of Japanese civilian populists. This decision was on the shoulder of Harry S. Truman, the United States President, who had to make this decision by deciding whether or not to drop a newly designed weapon. The atomic bomb was tested in the sands of New Mexico, where it proved to be very successful. Harry S. Truman made a very successful decision, because he wanted to end the war quickly, show others that the United States had power, and the retribution of Pearl Harbor. The United States wanted to end the war quickly for several reasons. The British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, states, â€Å"The atomic bomb is a reality†¦. Here ... Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Essay -- Japan, World War II, Imagine yourself making the toughest decision in your life, whether sacrificing a million of our men and thousands of war ships and plans, verses several thousand of Japanese civilian populists. This decision was on the shoulder of Harry S. Truman, the United States President, who had to make this decision by deciding whether or not to drop a newly designed weapon. The atomic bomb was tested in the sands of New Mexico, where it proved to be very successful. Harry S. Truman made a very successful decision, because he wanted to end the war quickly, show others that the United States had power, and the retribution of Pearl Harbor. The United States wanted to end the war quickly for several reasons. The British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, states, â€Å"The atomic bomb is a reality†¦. Here ...

Sandra Jones

The plaintiff in this case is Sandra Jones, and the defendant is Winnie Tsige. What is case is about is Winnie Tsige, has been surreptitiously looking at Sandra Jones banking records. 2. The case was heard September 29, 2011 by the court of appeal for Ontario, and the result at the original trial was does Ontario law recognize a right to bring a civil action for damages for the invasion of personal privacy. 3. The court that heard the case in the attached file was Kevin M. V.Whitaker, of the Superior court of Justice, date March 23 2011, with reasons reported at 2011 ONSC 1475, 333 D. L. R (4TH) 566. 4. The important facts in this case is Tsige and Jones did not know each other, and Tsige was in a relationship with Jones former husband. The other important fact were as a bank employee, Tsige had full access to Jones banking information and contrary to the bank’s policy, looked into Jones banking records at least 174 times over a period of four years. . The issues that the cour t had to decide is whether the motion judge erred by granting summary judgment and dismissing Jones claim for damages on the ground that Ontario law does not recognize the tort of beach of primacy. 6. The court refer to other cases because Jones appeals to the court, raising the following issue, did the motion judge err in holding that Ontario law does not recognize a cause of action for invasion of privacy. 7.The elements that are necessary in order to be successful with an action for intrusion upon seclusion is first, the defendant’s conduct must be intentional, within which I would include reckless; second that the defendant must have invaded, without lawful justification, the plaintiff’s private affairs or concerns; and third that a reasonable person would regard the invasion as highly offensive causing distress, humiliation or anguish. . The limitations on an action for intrusion upon seclusion are it is only intrusions into matters such as one’s financial or health records, sexual practices and orientation, employment, diary or private correspondence that, viewed objectively on the reasonable person standard, can be described as highly offensive. 9.The factors that the court will consider in setting damages in an action for intrusion upon seclusion is Tsige’s actions were deliberate and repeated and arose from complex web of domestic arrangements likely to provoke strong feelings and animosity, two Jones was understandably very upset by the intrusion into her private financial affairs, and Jones suffered no public embarrassment or harm to her health, welfare, social, business or financial position and Tsige has apologized for her conduct and made genuine attempts to make amends. 0. How this decision changes the law of intentional torts is intentional torts are actions by individuals or businesses that intentionally cause harm to others. When intentional torts occur in the workplace, they are often the result of employees losin g their tempers, but in this case Tsige repeatedly examined the private bank records of Jones and did not take any money or any harm to her banking she just committed the tort of intrusion upon seclusion because Tsige looked at Jones banking records 174 over a four year period. 11.This case has a huge impact on privacy because Winnie Tsige, was looking at Sandra Jones banking records 174 time over a four year period and she never realized it, and because they worked at different branches of the Bank of Montreal, Tsige had full access to banking information, and contrary to the banks policy, so Tsige could do whatever she wanted to and no one would find out because there are so many different branches for the Bank of Montreal. 12. This case is important because even though Tsige didn’t harm Jones physically she still sis a lot of damages to her by looking at her banking records many time over a period of time.Another reason this case is important is because Tsige had formed a common law relationship with Jones former husband and because Tsige was a employee at the Bank of Montreal, she had full access to jones banking records and anybody else she wanted to look at, and her Ex-husband was probably telling Tsige to look at Jones banking information and records to see her purchase, what she’s doing with the alimony payments he is giving her ever month, and what she does with her money.I believe just cause you work at the bank you shouldn’t have full access to banking information, you should only have that privilege if your high up in the bank, or if one of the tellers needs to look at someone’s banking information then the manager they’re should have to put in a password that only he/she knows so they can get that information.

Expunged Definition and Examples

Expungement is the destruction of court records related to an arrest or criminal proceeding. Even arrests that do not result in conviction end up on someones criminal record. That record can impact the person long after an offense is committed, limiting their ability to get a job, sign a lease, or attend college. Individual states have provisions for expungement to allow someone to remove a past incident from their record so that it no longer impacts them. Key Takeaways: Expungement Definition Expungement is a legal tool used by offenders and courts to eliminate past records of criminal activity. This tool can only be applied at the state level.When evaluating a petition to expunge records, a judge looks at criminal history, time lapsed, frequency of the offense, and type of offense.There is no federal statute governing expungement. The most common tool used to destroy the record of a crime is a pardon. Expunged Definition Different states have different procedures for expungement. Most states require a court order, signed by a judge, in order to expunge a record. This order includes the case number, offenses, and parties involved. It may also include a list of agencies where the records should be destroyed. Once a judge adds their signature to the order, records managers at these agencies follow state protocol for destroying the records. The standards for expungement at the state level are typically based on the seriousness of the crime, age of the offender, and time passed since conviction or arrest. The number of times an offender has committed the crime may also factor into whether a judge decides to grant an order of expungement. Most jurisdictions offer juvenile offenders a way to expunge their records. In some circumstances, a record may be expunged due to age, to make room in a state database for new records. Expungement has also been used to acknowledge prolonged periods of good behavior and as a remedy to an unlawful arrest. Expunging a record is different from sealing a record. Expungement destroys the record while sealing it limits who can view it. A court might order a record to be sealed rather than expunged to allow law enforcement to view someones criminal history, but not a potential employer during a background check. Different states have different standards for whether a court can order expungement of a record or for it to be sealed.   Expungement vs. Pardon A pardon is similar to expunging a record but makes use of a different structure of authority. An expungement order is issued by a judge, empowered to preside over legal proceedings in a court of law. A pardon is issued by an executive power like a governor, president, or king. The pardon removes any remaining sentence or penalty for a crime. It essentially forgives someone for the offense and treats them as if the offense had never occurred. Article II Section 2, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives the president the power to pardon someone convicted of a federal offense. The president does not have the authority to pardon someone convicted in state courts of a state level offense. The  Justice Department’s Office of the Pardon Attorney accepts requests from pardon seekers five years after their federal conviction or release. The office uses standards of evaluation similar to the courts in expungement cases. They look at the seriousness of the crime, behavior after sentencing, and whether the offender has acknowledged the extent of the crime. The office issues recommendations to the president in terms of the applications they’ve received. The president has final pardoning authority.   Expungement Laws in the United States There is no federal standard for expungement. The most common example of forgiveness for a federal crime is a pardon. Expungement laws and procedures at the state level vary. Some states only allow expungement after someone has been convicted of a low-level crime like a misdemeanor or infraction. The process for expungement at the state level includes a petition and hearing. In general, states do not allow expungement for serious crimes like rape, murder, kidnapping, and assault. Felonies and crimes in the first degree are also often ineligible, particularly when the victim of the crime is under the age of 18. Most state statutes require offenders to wait a set amount of time before making a request for their records to be expunged. For example, if someone wanted a speeding ticket expunged from their record, they might have to wait a set amount of years to request it and show that it was a one-time incident.  Some states allow families to request expungement of a crime committed by someone who has died. Expungement only concerns records kept at state agencies. An expungement order cannot force a private entity to remove a record of someone’s criminal offense. For example, if someone commits a crime, and a local newspaper publishes an article about it, that article would not be affected by an expungement order. Interviews and social media posts are also beyond the extent of a court order. An expungement order never fully removes the history of a crime from the public record. Sources and Further Reference â€Å"Expungement and Record Sealing.†Ã‚  Justia, www.justia.com/criminal/expungement-record-sealing/.â€Å"A Look at the Presidents Pardon Power and How It Works.†Ã‚  PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 26 Aug. 2017, www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/presidents-pardon-power-works.â€Å"What Is Expungement?†Ã‚  American Bar Association, www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/publications/teaching-legal-docs/what-is-_expungement-/.â€Å"Expunge.†Ã‚  NOLO, www.nolo.com/dictionary/expunge-term.html.